3 ms·
Yes, but you said that turning back to look is _not_ risky and only gave one number that is too close to look back without risk. Theoretically “at least” has no
by 1123581321 8y ago
Yes, but you said that turning back to look is _not_ risky and only gave one number that is too close to look back without risk. Theoretically “at least” has no upper bound, which I suppose gives you an out...
- wcarron 8y agoWell I admit, I never did the math on my rule of thumb. Perhaps it's time to revise it and give even more space. Maybe I've been, despite effort, still following too closely. Like I said, I try to give maximum space and be as responsible as possible. Not perfect though. I can still improve as a driver, as your math shows.