6 ms·
“The default name prefix is changed to be ‘sqlite’ spelled backwards” (2006)
- crooked-v 8y agoI'm reminded of the "car owners sending emails to the developer of curl" story. https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2016/11/14/i-have-toyota-corola/ https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2016/11/14/i-have-toyota-corola/
- shubhamjain 8y agoIs there a valid reason to publish your contact number? Wouldn't not having it accessible been the easier solution? Of course, someone could email too, but it's easier to deal with them; easier even to create a filter and ignore them altogether.
- dtech 8y agoBlaming people for having their contact info somewhere on the internet is not really relevant. There are many valid reasons why people could contact you or why you prefer contact information to be available somewhere, in this case for example to hire an expert SQLite consultant. Problem is that a determined enough misguided user will also be able to find you in that case.
- code_duck 8y agoThat’s fine, but I surely would not have my publicly listed phone number connected to something that could ring and wake me at night.
- slenk 8y agoThe internet seemed more trusting back in 2006. Also, things like Google Voice didn't exist yet and who knew spam/robocalls would be such an issue. Hindsight is always 20/20
- code_duck 8y agoMaybe 1996? 2006 is hardly the early days. I remember people are being more paranoid about the Internet then, stoked by confusion in the media. The people who manufactured my glass torch thought that if they publish their phone number on the Internet circa 2005, their phone would be ringing off the hook with strangers asking them questions. Also, that’s still was a time when some people still thought shopping online meant their credit card number was more likely to be stolen somehow. Granted that those who thought these things we’re not technologically sophisticated. These days, many businesses have their phone numbers on the Internet. I had mine on my Instagram profile. Nobody unusual called me. If I was embroiled in perennial controversy, though, or mistaken for someone who was, things likely would’ve been different.
- AaronLBratcher 8y ago"Also, that’s still was a time when some people still thought shopping online meant their credit card number was more likely to be stolen somehow." Perhaps they were wiser than we thought given all the data/security breaches in the past few years.
- code_duck 8y agoBut many of the breaches have involved companies like TJ Maxx or Target. Few realized that shopping at a nationwide brick and mortar store was a way a card might be stolen. Also, people thought their card would be intercepted during transmission, not taken from a database. That's what journalists were writing about, I guess.
- AaronLBratcher 8y agoI agree, the database hacking may not have been seen as much as it should have been by the general public. As a programmer I can say for sure that people like me, however, were thinking about it. Here's a link about recent data breaches that may include credit card information. Several big companies in here. https://www.businessinsider.com/data-breaches-2018-4 https://www.businessinsider.com/data-breaches-2018-4
- tracker1 8y agoWell, I have a fairly popular npm module (gulp module) that I don't use anymore... on ocassion an issue from a dependency will break things, or have a security issue etc. Many people's builds may be broken, and unfortunately I don't always keep up on email or github notifications. That said, if someone reached out, it's generally going to get a faster fix.
- yoavmmn 8y agoAm I the only one that doesn't get it? Why would anybody be annoyed by a temporary file?
- lathiat 8y agoTry take a summer vacation working in desktop support :)
- yoavmmn 8y agoI actually worked in desktop support a couple of years ago but I never got anything about temp files, most of the time it was the usual stuff (Internet stopped working, computer won't boot, etc.)
- DCoder 8y agoDepends on whether that temporary file gets properly cleaned up or not. A myriad of temporary files with more showing up every day could be a significant disk hog, especially for an enterprise with thousands of affected employees.
- yoavmmn 8y agoOK, that actually makes some sense to me.
- taspeotis 8y agoPeople get upset over all sorts of things. Look at this thread [1] where everybody without a clue gets involved to solve the mystery of an NTFS ADS called :WofCompressedData. [1] https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/what-is-wofcompresseddata/1a9f431e-e14c-46d7-9883-a0e92467be5d https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/what-i...
- TrueTom 8y agoThis thread is pretty much every Microsoft forum thread ever.
- okket 8y agoPrevious discussion from 4 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9196218 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9196218 (108 comments)
- tinco 8y agoAs the developers of the Phusion Passenger application server we would get emails from Justin Bieber fans when one of their fan sites went down. Same for a couple of other community products that used our server. It was actually quite fun because we'd learn about some group of users who benefited from our open source product that we're normally not aware of. It was also a but difficult because like sqlite it's not easy to explain why our company name is on this error page when we're actually not responsible for the problem.
- derimagia 8y agoWhen linking to github you should use the hotkey "y" to get a permalink to the line number on the commit, otherwise it changes as code changes: https://github.com/endlesssoftware/sqlite3/blob/8004eeafeec9ac4bc0fbc7a3c0bb01eca55694a0/os.h#L133 https://github.com/endlesssoftware/sqlite3/blob/8004eeafeec9...
- rkeene2 8y agoEven better, don't link to some random version in GitHub but use the Fossil version on SQLite's site: https://sqlite.org/src/artifact?ln=43-66&name=48388821692e87da https://sqlite.org/src/artifact?ln=43-66&name=48388821692e87...
- t0mbstone 8y agoNo offense, but this is a dumb solution to the problem. You honestly think that people having this problem can't google "etilqs" and still find sqlite? https://www.google.com/search?q=etilqs&oq=etilqs https://www.google.com/search?q=etilqs&oq=etilqs
- beatgammit 8y agoDid you read the comment? It says something like: > People smart enough to figure out the code are also smart enough to realize that emailing the developer won't help. I don't know what pulls up on that search result for you (Google searches are individualized), but for me, I mostly get tips on how to resolve it, not the SQLite developers. I don't know if it works, but it seems like a pretty harmless change.