http://homepages.gac.edu/~jwotton2/PSY225/rosenthal66.pdf http://homepages.gac.edu/~jwotton2/PSY225/rosenthal66.pdf https://sites.google.com/site/7arosenthal/

http://homepages.gac.edu/~jwotton2/PSY225/rosenthal66.pdf http://homepages.gac.edu/~jwotton2/PSY225/rosenthal66.pdf https://sites.google.com/site/7arosenthal/ https://sites.google.com/site/7arosenthal/ Per: Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1966 study, which deserves wider appreciation? I want to emphasise 1966 was when this was published so it isn't overlooked as we all read pretty fast with these things. edit: Found a link to the original paper: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.488.8077&rep=rep1&type=pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.488... More recent criticism of the original: https://thenewstatistics.com/itns/2018/04/03/weve-been-here-before-the-replication-crisis-over-the-pygmalion-effect/ https://thenewstatistics.com/itns/2018/04/03/weve-been-here-...