5 ms·
Couldn't agree more, by the end it was readily apparent that the host was on a strict time schedule and was required to talk with each Nobel laureate about thei
by robkop 8y ago
Couldn't agree more, by the end it was readily apparent that the host was on a strict time schedule and was required to talk with each Nobel laureate about their specific work.
A real loss considering that some of the conversations were just heading somewhere interesting before they got cut off.
- Pinus 8y agoAs far as I can tell, this was aired by Swedish TV as "Snillen spekulerar" (they have been doing a programme like this every year since approximately the dawn of TV time), and by the BBC as "Nobel Minds". So, it has to fit into a TV schedule slot, and be appropriate for a general audience, not just science nerds. BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/n3ct5g1c https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/n3ct5g1c SvT: https://www.svtplay.se/video/20431599/nobel/nobel-2018-snillen-spekulerar-avsnitt-1 https://www.svtplay.se/video/20431599/nobel/nobel-2018-snill...
- espeed 8y agoYes, the original title of the post included Nobel Minds 2018, but it was modified to emphasize the description. I discovered the Nobel Minds series a few years ago. I think last year's was better, but I agree, the episodes can be hit or miss. They should let Joe Rogan do the interviews -- he's been interviewing a bunch of leading scientists of late (Sir Roger Penrose a couple weeks ago) -- Rogan's our modern day Charlie Rose -- he let's them talk and it evolves into interesting conversations.