The article makes it very difficult to follow up because no direct link to the scientific paper is given. This lapse is unfortunately way too common and puts t

The article makes it very difficult to follow up because no direct link to the scientific paper is given. This lapse is unfortunately way too common and puts the author as well as the publisher in an unprofessional light. Presumably, this is the paper: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6331/1312 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6331/1312 Given the title, you can look up on Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=+0+REPORTS+A+conserved+NAD%2B+binding+pocket+that+regulates+protein-protein+interactions+during+aging&btnG= https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=+0+R... Click on the "Cited by" link at the bottom of the entry to see the 47 papers that have cited this one to date: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=6666909628793143847&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=6666909628793143847... Reverse chronological sort didn't find anything that looked like a follow-up.