4 ms·
Work stoppage followed by collective bargaining. They were literally the only three persons who could do the work. Ground control had to negotiate. OTOH, it co
by officemonkey 8y ago
Work stoppage followed by collective bargaining. They were literally the only three persons who could do the work. Ground control had to negotiate.
OTOH, it could have been the commander's sole decision, which means it wasn't a strike. He may have decided that as the commander he needed a fit crew and this was the only way to attain that.
- pbhjpbhj 8y agoEven if the commander called the strike, if the crew agreed or acted in accord, then that would still be a strike, no?
- drharby 8y agoCommander tends to retain... command authority. The crew doesnt agree, they execute orders. Hence the phrase 'burden of command'
- vladd 8y agoIn some situations, disagreement early in the decision making process could be beneficial to all participants. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disagree_and_commit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disagree_and_commit for context (a principle used at Intel and Amazon).
- drharby 8y agoYes - which is why there is a concept of good and bad leadership. Commanders shouls consider all forms of feedback on a decision
- officemonkey 8y agoThey have to follow the commander's legal orders. Whether they agreed or not should be immaterial.
- pbhjpbhj 8y agoA strike isn't an order, so I'm not sure how that thought progresses things.