3 ms·

I guess I feel you like you are not arguing in good faith if you can't see why a woman being the first to achieve a physically demanding task at world class lev

I guess I feel you like you are not arguing in good faith if you can't see why a woman being the first to achieve a physically demanding task at world class level is not interesting. Even if we were to put reality aside and assuming that men and women have equal physical talents on average it would still be interesting if only because it is rare for such things to happen and I can't believe I am bothering to explain this.

pbhjpbhj 8y ago
My position is that you can't maintain neutrality on the sex of people who make achievements if you keep highlighting it. It's a phenomenal achievement, period. I really, genuinely, can't see why Hill's sex, say, is important here. Could you spell it out for me? I've no idea what nationality she is, if she's say Inuit, would that be notable relative to her achievement?