How does the current state of things stand in light of the recent Dynamex (https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/09/07/california-supreme-court-independent-contr

How does the current state of things stand in light of the recent Dynamex (https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/09/07/california-supreme-court-independent-contractors/ https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/09/07/california-suprem...) decision? According to that ruling (https://cbssacramento.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/dynamex-operations-west-v-superior-court-of-los-angeles.pdf https://cbssacramento.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/dynamex-op...), workers are considered to be independent contractors only if all of the following conditions are met, employees otherwise: (A) that the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of such work and in fact; (B) that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) that the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity. It seems like tvcs doing software engineering at Google would not count as independent contractors (failing, in fact, to meet even one of the three conditions). Edits for clarity.