3 ms·
Why not Mac? Best of both worlds.
by tmh88j 8y ago
Why not Mac? Best of both worlds.
- copperx 8y agoI would have said the same thing a year ago. Today not so much because Apple hardware prices have skyrocketed. It used to be that a Mac cost 2x the PC equivalent, but now the cost is reaching 3x. For many, especially considering engineering salaries, that's justified. To me, having the familiar GNU toolchain and Linux configuration available at any moment without having to use a VM or Homebrew is worth the downgrade in eye candy.
- tmh88j 8y ago>Today not so much because Apple hardware prices have skyrocketed. He said >I, as a consumer, would gladly pay good money to be able to use Outlook and the MS Office suite. You can do that on a Mac.
- lostlogin 8y ago> Today not so much because Apple hardware prices have skyrocketed. Have they? Or have PC prices fallen fast and far? It’s hard to compare due to the product continually changing (insert some sort of apples with apples joke), but it looks to me like Mac prices have fallen. https://everymac.com/global-mac-prices/mac-prices-us-usa-united-states-america.html https://everymac.com/global-mac-prices/mac-prices-us-usa-uni...
- axaxs 8y agoPersonal preference. I don't dislike Apple, I just don't like being so tied to hardware. I've got this little custom NUC I do all my dev work on and have come to really enjoy it. Also, I've come to prefer many things about linux, especially its interface(yes, really).