4 ms·
>Are you saying that the more complicated things are, the more it hints at a simulation? No, I'm saying that the fact that we can see down to a subatomic level
by ryanmercer 8y ago
>Are you saying that the more complicated things are, the more it hints at a simulation?
No, I'm saying that the fact that we can see down to a subatomic level which adds considerable complexity to a hypothetical simulation is not evidence that it is impossible that we live in a simulation.
If you tried to describe a 2018 smartphone to Konrad Zuse in 1936 he'd have thought you were either quite mad or a science fiction author. To him it would almost certainly be unfathomable as reality, even with him knowing that he created the first programmable computer. Hell, if you actually showed an iPhone to most of us in the 70's, 80's, or early 90's we'd likely have had a rough time processing it at first, especially if you loaded a VR game or some 4k video.
- Dylan16807 8y ago> No, I'm saying that the fact that we can see down to a subatomic level which adds considerable complexity to a hypothetical simulation is not evidence that it is impossible that we live in a simulation. Okay, but I suggest you be a bit more careful with wording in the future. "These are both somewhat my logic" made it sound like the complexity was reinforcing the idea, rather than merely not completely disproving the idea. With that clarified the rest of what I said is useless and a waste of both our time.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]