7 ms·
That's possible, sure, but the evidence here doesn't support that conclusion any more than it supports the reverse. When you have a small group of things that c
by fenomas 8y ago
That's possible, sure, but the evidence here doesn't support that conclusion any more than it supports the reverse. When you have a small group of things that clearly weren't chosen at random, the safe bet is that they don't imply anything about the set from which they were selected.
- seanmcdirmid 8y agoThe evidence doesn't support any conclusion really. We are just guessing. I'm merely calling what what A could be in A implies B.