3 ms·
> I don't get it. If it's all accurate then what is the problem exactly? Selective reporting is a huge problem. You can distort almost any topic by selectively
by sanxiyn 8y ago
> I don't get it. If it's all accurate then what is the problem exactly?
Selective reporting is a huge problem. You can distort almost any topic by selectively reporting only truthful things.
- hardwaresofton 8y agoYup. In addition to this, for every extremist/unsavory group that gathers on FB there are probably a bunch more wholesome (or at least unsavory) groups that have a chance to congregate for almost free (minus the cost of some privacy). Facebook is accelerating volunteer orgs, philanthropies, and all sorts of other organizations that do good, but that doesn't necessarily get reported on, an even when it does the cynical. Again, I'm not defending Facebook, but it's pretty peculiar -- they just seem to have been in hot water every day for the last few months. Maybe it's a vicious PR cycle where regular media outlets are now being incentivized to report on FB's negative press because that's what's getting clicks.... because negative press is being produced. [EDIT] wanted to add that this is part of how people get sucked into conspiracy theories... No one has time to verify and fact-check every single fact, and editors/media outlets are doing it less and less these days. A few lies mixed in with a bunch of facts are sometimes really hard to find but can have lasting impacts on your world view/view of some subject. Of course, sometimes conspiracy theories, outlandish-seeming claims, and smear jobs are sometimes true and justified.
- amelius 8y agoTrue, but it happens in a company's good times as well as bad times. Emphasizing this distortion only now would introduce a bias.
- gaius 8y agoYou can distort almost any topic by selectively reporting only truthful thing You mean like, determining what users see on their timelines?