3 ms·
Well iPhone ads use DSLR lens in front of the iPhone. A bit closer to reality, but net effects are the same, fake advertising. This is not to excuse Samsung, i
by ttty 8y ago
Well iPhone ads use DSLR lens in front of the iPhone. A bit closer to reality, but net effects are the same, fake advertising.
This is not to excuse Samsung, it's just to remember that most of the companies does that and all should be mentioned, not just one.
- nomagicbullet 8y agoDo you have a source?
- pembrook 8y agoNot sure what you’re talking about. If you go on the iPhone pages of the Apple website you can clearly see the same artifacting, noise patterns, and lens distortion from both the native iPhone sensor and native wide angle and portrait lenses. I am 100% positive they did not use lens attachments in those photos. Also, the lens adapters don’t make the photo quality “better.” They just have the ability to modify the focal length.
- briandear 8y agoFalse. Even the iPhone billboards were shot with iPhone without “attachments.” Time magazine had covers shot on iPhone without attachments. http://time.com/4921227/time-magazine-covers-shot-on-iphone/ http://time.com/4921227/time-magazine-covers-shot-on-iphone/
- hacym 8y agoI find it funny that people care about the equipment a photo is taken on. Those photos are taken by professional photographers with professional lighting setups and professional models. I subscribe to Ken Rockwell's belief that you don't need a fancy camera to take a good photo, you just need to be a good photographer [0]. I used to sell cameras in high school/college, and ALWAYS steered people away from DSLRs/high megapixel cameras that flaunt the quality of their cameras. Likely, those people will never get close to needing a high-quality camera's features, and their purchase of one would almost always result in a return. [0] https://kenrockwell.com/tech/150-vs-5000-dollar-camera.htm https://kenrockwell.com/tech/150-vs-5000-dollar-camera.htm