3 ms·
Is that true? I thought her claims were investigated in detail and found to be clearly false, with witnesses she said were there saying they had no clue what sh
by repolfx 8y ago
Is that true? I thought her claims were investigated in detail and found to be clearly false, with witnesses she said were there saying they had no clue what she was talking about and remembered no such party, her own testimony contradicted itself, etc. And then the fact that she waited decades to do anything about it.
The last I heard about Kavanaugh he'd been totally exonerated. There's no reason to believe he did anything to this woman.
- neaden 8y agoNo, that is not what happened. Her claims were briefly investigated, there was only one other witness, Mike Judge, and he was not questioned. No one else remembers that specific party but they all agreed that it was the kind of thing get together they would have gone too, her testimony was consistent, and lots of assault victims wait a long time before coming forward. So you managed to be wrong about everything.
- sk4rekr0w 8y agoThis is an entirely unfair representation of what happened. First, his name was Mark Judge not "Mike" Judge - so get off the high horse about being factually correct when you can't even get one name right. Zero corroborating eyewitnesses, zero recollection of the location of the "party" from 35 years ago.