4 ms·

The article have 76 cookies (48 third-party), and send almost 300 third-party requests that violate the privacy of the readers. https://webbkoll.dataskydd.net/e

The article have 76 cookies (48 third-party), and send almost 300 third-party requests that violate the privacy of the readers. https://webbkoll.dataskydd.net/en/results?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles%2Fchina-has-early-lead-on-electric-commercial-vehicles-1543755601 https://webbkoll.dataskydd.net/en/results?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw... I think people should be more curious and concerned about the ethical and moral behaviour of these publishers.

zizee 8y ago
This is a good argument for usage of adblockers/privacy tools, or simply not visiting offending sites, or requesting more transparency about the tracking tools, or agitating for stricter privacy laws... I don't this is a good argument for republishing someone else's work without permission. > I think people should be more curious and concerned about the ethical and moral behaviour of these publishers. Can we not do both?
- Dylan16807 8y ago
  They're republishing a publically accessible document, which is behind "paywall" that isn't actually a wall. So I'm fine with it. Even if it's technically a copyright violation.