3 ms·
edit: actually, I'm wrong, see below You're right, I believe. I don't have time to investigate, but if the claim is 90% efficiency w.r.t. total radiation input
by darkmighty 8y ago
edit: actually, I'm wrong, see below
You're right, I believe. I don't have time to investigate, but if the claim is 90% efficiency w.r.t. total radiation input, it's certainly wrong. Doing so would violate the 2nd law. For example, room temperature thermal radiation has significant emmitance in the radio range of the spectrum. Needless to say nobody can build radio antennas to turn this energy into work.
If it is 90% of the thermodynamic limit, then maybe. But then I think multijunction cells are already significantly close to the thermodynamic limit (much better than 22% claimed).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot%27s_theorem_(thermodynamics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot%27s_theorem_(thermodyna...
(obs1: substituting Tsun as Th and Tearth as Tc left as an exercise to the reader ;) )
(obs2: try changing Tc to CMB temperature! )
- Dylan16807 8y agoThose "significant" amounts of radio are an extremely small amount compared to the visible and near infrared output of the sun. > substituting Tsun as Th and Tearth as Tc left as an exercise to the reader Left to the reader because doing the math reveals that it's only a 6% difference and undermines your point? ;)
- darkmighty 8y agoOh thanks. I hadn't actually plugged in the numbers, shame on me :P It seems the maximum efficiency in this case is ~94.8%, so the claim does seem plausible at least.