3 ms·
The Westfriedhof station pictured is also in Munich, not Stockholm, guess it's a copy/paste error. It is kinda nice, but it's relatively young (15 years maybe?)
by wink 8y ago
The Westfriedhof station pictured is also in Munich, not Stockholm, guess it's a copy/paste error. It is kinda nice, but it's relatively young (15 years maybe?) whereas most of our subway stations are from the 70s and not half as nice.
Edit: it's 20 years old, not 15: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westfriedhof_(Munich_U-Bahn) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westfriedhof_(Munich_U-Bahn) and the others pictured are also on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg-Brauchle-Ring_(Munich_U-Bahn) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg-Brauchle-Ring_(Munich_U-... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidplatz_(Munich_U-Bahn) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidplatz_(Munich_U-Bahn)
- the8472 8y agoOld does not mean it has to look shabby as the moscow stations demonstrate. Or these from berlin: http://www.iridetheharlemline.com/2014/07/02/beautiful-underground-gems-of-the-berlin-u-bahn/ http://www.iridetheharlemline.com/2014/07/02/beautiful-under...
- wink 8y agoNo of course not, but some stations here have this "this wall was modern in the 70s, also it's kinda grimy and some of the tiles fell off" look - like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sendlinger_Tor_(Munich_U-Bahn) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sendlinger_Tor_(Munich_U-Bahn), but some were worse. They are renovating some - and to be honest if it's structurally sound I couldn't care less if it looks shabby, I was just trying to point out the differences - because some of the newer ones look really nice :)