>New York judges took the view that debtors waived their rights when they signed the papers. where is the boundary of validity between "sign here to waive your

>New York judges took the view that debtors waived their rights when they signed the papers. where is the boundary of validity between "sign here to waive your right to defend yourself" and "sign here to waive the right to keep your head (i.e. decapitation)" legally defined? is it possible to sign and allow a person to decapitate me? if not why not? and why is the right to defend yourself not similarily protected? it seems at some point both bankers and judges expect civilians to subjugate themselves unconditionally...