3 ms·
You escalated your example a bit fast (putting it squarely in the territory of a maybe overly emotional argument), but you touch on a not unreasonable question.
by krageon 8y ago
You escalated your example a bit fast (putting it squarely in the territory of a maybe overly emotional argument), but you touch on a not unreasonable question. Does the horse's right to decide who it has sex with not factor into this decision at all?
- VBprogrammer 8y agoIn an amusing twist of fate the horse would probably not exist had it not been for a long line of humans deciding which horses bred with which other horses to produce the breeds we know today.
- mlevental 8y agoi'm sorry i escalated? the person i was responding to cited the distinction between murder and manslaughter? >I'm saying that intent informs morality. eg: Murder and Man Slaughter.