3 ms·

Thats what C++ thought too :). I believe the whole point of this paper is to argue your point (minus the whole lets simplify the compiler so that it cant do a t

by jzoch 8y ago

Thats what C++ thought too :). I believe the whole point of this paper is to argue your point (minus the whole lets simplify the compiler so that it cant do a ton of optimizations part since nobody would agree to that)

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
amelius 8y ago
Well, in my book correctness comes first. So if you want to do multi-threading without changing the language, then you'll have to fix the compiler (to make it preserve correctness).
- jmalicki 8y ago
  C++ did change the language - its specification of correctness. The definition of what is correct well-defined behavior is part of the language.
  - amelius 8y ago
    Yes, the article is about not changing the language, though.