6 ms·

Is Visual Studio going to be available in an ARM native format? I understand you can emulate x86 applications on Windows On ARM, but it would be nice if they pr

Is Visual Studio going to be available in an ARM native format? I understand you can emulate x86 applications on Windows On ARM, but it would be nice if they provided a native performance experience. I also feel like Microsoft and Apple are both doing cool stuff with the ARM space... but it would be cooler together. The iPad Pro is incredible, but iOS is so limiting. Windows 10 on ARM seems nice, but none of the hardware seems compelling, and no one makes a mobile ARM chip that's even remotely competitive with the A12X. Since Apple is never going to let Windows 10 run on their iPad Pro, the least they could do is bring Xcode, Terminal, and external storage support to iPad Pro... but who knows if that's going to ever happen.

sedatk 8y ago
Probably not until the platform gains enough traction. It’s a complicated, gigantic beast. VS Code, on the other hand, seems like a more tangible goal at the beginning.
- jchw 8y ago
  I mean, it's mostly Chrome right? I bet ARM electron and VS Code could be done today.
  - DennisAleynikov 8y ago
    vscode runs on samsung phones with Samsung DeX so ARM64 isnt the limiting factor. In general samsung is awesome at this and is spreading the linux love to their android platform with https://linuxondex.com https://linuxondex.com
    - bpye 8y ago
      Not sure anyone has built Electron for Windows/ARM64 whilst it's worked for a long time on Linux/ARM64.
drEv0 8y ago
Xcode is finicky enough on the Mac. My vote would be for Apple to focus on improving it on the one platform instead of trying to shoehorn it into iOS. Better yet, free us Swift/Cocoa/iOS developers to use whatever platform we choose.
mrpippy 8y ago
Visual Studio still isn’t even 64-bit native on Intel. I wouldn’t be surprised if that got fixed in the next year or two, but I think ARM native is farther off (depending on how well ARM machines do in the marketplace)
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- foepys 8y ago
  Microsoft stated some time ago that they don't want VS to be 64bit because it would use too much memory then. Instead they are using worker processes that can run in 64bit to do the heavy lifting.
npunt 8y ago
It looks like Xcode on iPad is probably happening based on some hires they've been doing. iOS 13 is also going to be a big update for iPad. Seems they're on an every other year release cycle for big iOS iPad updates - 9 introduced multitasking, 11 introduced big UI changes, and now lots of 13 rumors. I'd look at this year's new iPad hardware as a sign that they're serious about iPad as the next computing paradigm and are putting a lot of effort behind making the platform suitable for a variety of professionals.
- cenal 8y ago
  In some ways I’m glad in other ways it’s sad to see many considering a locked down device as an option for software development. Maybe it’s a good learning solution. Hopefully it never takes off as more than that.
  - Tsubasachan 8y ago
    Developers love Apple. The fact that its locked down means everyone has to go through the official store. Follow the money: billions are being made on Apple devices. Apple users spend more money than Android users.
- bluescrn 8y ago
  Can they really build an Xcode for iOS while sandboxing apps and refusing to expose the underlying file system? (Would your app icons, for example, be forced to live in your iOS photo stream, as it’s the only way to share images between apps? What about non-image data files?) Even if those issues can be addressed, iOS native UI is completely and utterly touch-centric, designed for fat fingers on small screens - and so far, nobody has really succeeded in building feature-rich professional software with high-complexity UIs within that paradigm. Also, most developers demand multiple monitors as well as the precision of a keyboard and mouse... who would be the audience for XCode-on-iOS?
  - coder543 8y ago
    > Can they really build an Xcode for iOS while sandboxing apps and refusing to expose the underlying file system? I think that's kind of the point. Apple is going to eventually have to give certain classes of users more freedom if they want to see the iPad Pro adopted as a Pro platform. Consistently, every single major review I read or watched for the iPad Pro berated Apple about this. The Verge, Engadget, MKBHD, and many others. Reviewers are not just letting Apple get away with this. Apple is going to have to open this up, even though some people like to believe they're never going to do that for some reason. > most developers demand multiple monitors as well as the precision of a keyboard and mouse iOS already has great keyboard support, and with the USB-C port on the iPad Pro, you can literally plug it into a USB-C dock and instantly have an external monitor, keyboard, and more connected, and yes, the monitor can show different content, it doesn't have to mirror the internal iPad display. The iPad Pro's keyboard folio case is really great. I think it's actually a slightly more pleasant typing experience than what Apple's current generation Butterfly keyboards offer on their laptops. Mouse support is another thing that reviewers have harped on Apple for. Whether they will support that at an OS-level or not is honestly more questionable than whether they're going to open up the underlying file system to advanced users, in my opinion. > who would be the audience for XCode-on-iOS? - Developers who like portability. - Developers who like powerful hardware. (considering the iPad Pro is easily more powerful than the new MacBook Air and many of the MacBook Pros) - Developers who like a great display... that 120Hz Liquid Retina display is really fantastic. - Developers who enjoy long battery life. - iOS Developers who want to save money. (an iPad Pro is cheaper than a MacBook, although not by as much as it should be) Which developers wouldn't be interested in a professional-grade iPad Pro, given the list above? Unfortunately, Apple hasn't released such an iPad Pro yet, due to software limitations.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
chrisper 8y ago
Is there a reason you can't just use remote desktop on the iPad Pro? Obviosuly, this is not the solution for all situations, but still.
- coder543 8y ago
  At that point, why buy an iPad Pro to work at 5 FPS only when you have an internet connection, when you could buy a laptop that works at 60 FPS all the time? The iPad Pro hardware is incredible, and if you're remoted into another computer, you're not really using the iPad Pro's hardware. Regardless, for non-developer tasks, I think it would be really fun to have an iPad Pro. I just wish Apple would allow it to actually be a pro-level machine for developers. Apple is the limiting factor there.

sedatk 8y ago

Probably not until the platform gains enough traction. It’s a complicated, gigantic beast. VS Code, on the other hand, seems like a more tangible goal at the beginning.

jchw 8y ago
I mean, it's mostly Chrome right? I bet ARM electron and VS Code could be done today.
- DennisAleynikov 8y ago
  vscode runs on samsung phones with Samsung DeX so ARM64 isnt the limiting factor. In general samsung is awesome at this and is spreading the linux love to their android platform with https://linuxondex.com https://linuxondex.com
  - bpye 8y ago
    Not sure anyone has built Electron for Windows/ARM64 whilst it's worked for a long time on Linux/ARM64.

drEv0 8y ago

Xcode is finicky enough on the Mac. My vote would be for Apple to focus on improving it on the one platform instead of trying to shoehorn it into iOS. Better yet, free us Swift/Cocoa/iOS developers to use whatever platform we choose.

mrpippy 8y ago

Visual Studio still isn’t even 64-bit native on Intel. I wouldn’t be surprised if that got fixed in the next year or two, but I think ARM native is farther off (depending on how well ARM machines do in the marketplace)

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
foepys 8y ago
Microsoft stated some time ago that they don't want VS to be 64bit because it would use too much memory then. Instead they are using worker processes that can run in 64bit to do the heavy lifting.

npunt 8y ago

It looks like Xcode on iPad is probably happening based on some hires they've been doing. iOS 13 is also going to be a big update for iPad. Seems they're on an every other year release cycle for big iOS iPad updates - 9 introduced multitasking, 11 introduced big UI changes, and now lots of 13 rumors. I'd look at this year's new iPad hardware as a sign that they're serious about iPad as the next computing paradigm and are putting a lot of effort behind making the platform suitable for a variety of professionals.

cenal 8y ago
In some ways I’m glad in other ways it’s sad to see many considering a locked down device as an option for software development. Maybe it’s a good learning solution. Hopefully it never takes off as more than that.
- Tsubasachan 8y ago
  Developers love Apple. The fact that its locked down means everyone has to go through the official store. Follow the money: billions are being made on Apple devices. Apple users spend more money than Android users.
bluescrn 8y ago
Can they really build an Xcode for iOS while sandboxing apps and refusing to expose the underlying file system? (Would your app icons, for example, be forced to live in your iOS photo stream, as it’s the only way to share images between apps? What about non-image data files?) Even if those issues can be addressed, iOS native UI is completely and utterly touch-centric, designed for fat fingers on small screens - and so far, nobody has really succeeded in building feature-rich professional software with high-complexity UIs within that paradigm. Also, most developers demand multiple monitors as well as the precision of a keyboard and mouse... who would be the audience for XCode-on-iOS?
- coder543 8y ago
  > Can they really build an Xcode for iOS while sandboxing apps and refusing to expose the underlying file system? I think that's kind of the point. Apple is going to eventually have to give certain classes of users more freedom if they want to see the iPad Pro adopted as a Pro platform. Consistently, every single major review I read or watched for the iPad Pro berated Apple about this. The Verge, Engadget, MKBHD, and many others. Reviewers are not just letting Apple get away with this. Apple is going to have to open this up, even though some people like to believe they're never going to do that for some reason. > most developers demand multiple monitors as well as the precision of a keyboard and mouse iOS already has great keyboard support, and with the USB-C port on the iPad Pro, you can literally plug it into a USB-C dock and instantly have an external monitor, keyboard, and more connected, and yes, the monitor can show different content, it doesn't have to mirror the internal iPad display. The iPad Pro's keyboard folio case is really great. I think it's actually a slightly more pleasant typing experience than what Apple's current generation Butterfly keyboards offer on their laptops. Mouse support is another thing that reviewers have harped on Apple for. Whether they will support that at an OS-level or not is honestly more questionable than whether they're going to open up the underlying file system to advanced users, in my opinion. > who would be the audience for XCode-on-iOS? - Developers who like portability. - Developers who like powerful hardware. (considering the iPad Pro is easily more powerful than the new MacBook Air and many of the MacBook Pros) - Developers who like a great display... that 120Hz Liquid Retina display is really fantastic. - Developers who enjoy long battery life. - iOS Developers who want to save money. (an iPad Pro is cheaper than a MacBook, although not by as much as it should be) Which developers wouldn't be interested in a professional-grade iPad Pro, given the list above? Unfortunately, Apple hasn't released such an iPad Pro yet, due to software limitations.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

chrisper 8y ago

Is there a reason you can't just use remote desktop on the iPad Pro? Obviosuly, this is not the solution for all situations, but still.

coder543 8y ago
At that point, why buy an iPad Pro to work at 5 FPS only when you have an internet connection, when you could buy a laptop that works at 60 FPS all the time? The iPad Pro hardware is incredible, and if you're remoted into another computer, you're not really using the iPad Pro's hardware. Regardless, for non-developer tasks, I think it would be really fun to have an iPad Pro. I just wish Apple would allow it to actually be a pro-level machine for developers. Apple is the limiting factor there.