4 ms·
Sounds like the most reasonable explanation. But here comes the key part in the article: > the study is very small – only 11 Yekwana individuals over the age o
by unicornporn 8y ago
Sounds like the most reasonable explanation. But here comes the key part in the article:
> the study is very small – only 11 Yekwana individuals over the age of 40 took part in the research
- AstralStorm 8y agoIn short, not even enough for a pilot study. Why did they even bother publishing it?
- yuy910616 8y agoand they self-selected into the study...
- pessimizer 8y agoBecause it generates headlines that confirm people's preexisting beliefs.
- cultus 8y agoWhat a joke. "Scientific" studies like this are hugely damaging to the public's understanding of science and their health choices. Terrible for science as well, considering the vast majority of scientists don't even actually know what a P-value is, they cannot reliably judge garbage like this.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- modzu 8y agoouch. oh man, yup. ugh.. i cant even