13 ms·
Your problem is still with YouTube kids and not with YouTube. Your entire argument is the filtration they tried failed. We agree. Great. My point is that the
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Your problem is still with YouTube kids and not with YouTube.
Your entire argument is the filtration they tried failed. We agree. Great.
My point is that the conclusion you draw is that everything needs more censorship. We disagree. I think parents need to take responsibility and not blame a company for providing a product they don't like.
Its the equivalent of censoring the radio because think of the children. It was a dumb idea then, it's a dumb idea now, because everyone knows that's not where it ends.
- detaro 8y agoI don't see where you get the idea that that's the conclusion they draw. It seems like you arguing against something they never said.
- Lkjhmnbv 8y agoHow do you understand the arguments.
- detaro 8y agoThat they're unhappy with how they handled YouTube Kids, nothing about censoring the main YT product.
- Lkjhmnbv 8y agoAnd I said his problem is with YouTube kids not YouTube. Not sure what part of that you disagree with.
- detaro 8y ago> My point is that the conclusion you draw is that everything needs more censorship. That claim about their conclusion I do not understand, since I don't see where they are saying anything like that.
- Lkjhmnbv 8y agoThey believe YouTube kids is possible if only YouTube were to censor more content. My argument is that more censorship won't help, because not everyone agrees on what is, and is not, kid friendly. So the entire enterprise is doomed to failure. The only solution I see is parents taking responsibility.