4 ms·
The article makes it sound like the autopilot was engaged, the plane slammed into a dive, and the pilots panicked for 18 seconds before finding and fixing the p
by PhasmaFelis 8y ago
The article makes it sound like the autopilot was engaged, the plane slammed into a dive, and the pilots panicked for 18 seconds before finding and fixing the problem. It looks like what actually happened is the plane started to slowly pitch down; the pilots were busy with the after-takeoff checklist and didn't notice for 15 seconds until an alarm went off, when the pilot immediately disengaged the autopilot, pulled up, and reduced engine power.
- dsfyu404ed 8y agoImagine being the flight attendant trying to pour coffee in what was probably a 1.5G (or thereabouts) maneuver.
- sokoloff 8y agoThe cabin crew is almost surely seated below the 10,000’ MSL level. (Many airlines give the cabin crew a chime signal to indicate they’re in the climb, high enough, and expecting it’s safe to begin cabin service. Below 10K, cabin crew is focused on safety not coffee service.)
- VBprogrammer 8y agoIn an ideal world this might be true. In practice below 10000ft the cabin crew are focused on grabbing some lunch, a drink or just a rest before the rest of the flight. Source: My partner is ex-cabin crew.
- yashap 8y agoWell, it does say they reached a descent rate of 4,200 ft/min (72 ft/second), which is pretty rapid.
- shawabawa3 8y agoyou only feel acceleration not speed though - depends how quickly it accelerated to 22m/second - presumably linearly through the 18 seconds? which means 1.2m/s^2, or about 0.12G - not that extreme really
- yashap 8y agoYeah, it’s certainly not a freefall, but still scary. They pulled out of the descent at 928 feet, descending 72 feet per second. Assuming they were still accelerating, they were probably less than 10 seconds from the ground. Good thing the pilot reacted to the alarms immediately! Of course, we don’t know if there were other systems to prevent this. But if there weren’t, and it was truly a situation of “if the pilot reacts 10 seconds slower here, everyone dies”, then they should likely put more sanity checks into the autopilot system.
- PMan74 8y ago"An Air Accidents Investigation Branch report said warnings alerted the pilot, who fixed the error at 928ft (283m)." It's odd, you'd think that the sensation of dropping 500ft (152m) in 18 seconds would have alerted him, especially after take off. It's hard to visualise what that would feel like.
- lbriner 8y agoYou are expecting some change in G-force due to changing to AP, you don't necessarily feel the start of the drop and once descent is consistent, it won't feel that alarming, add to that the fact that you think the AP is correctly set and you have confirmation bias and won't notice anything wrong. Just goes to show that we still don't really know if we should "trust the plane" or "trust the pilot".
- xaedes 8y agoRegarding who to trust; both: trust the whole cyber-physical system. And like OP said, the system worked as designed. The bigger system now even learns from this and improves the existing cyber-physical system to handle such cases even better / earlier or avoid them: "Flybe implemented remedial actions quickly in response to the incident and our training and procedures have been amended to minimise the risk of a reoccurrence".
- kss238 8y agoI mentioned this is another comment but If you read the UK Government report that is not what happened. The plane was at 1500 ft when it began to descend. At 1300 ft the warning sounds activated and the pilot reacted but it took another 300 ft of descent before the pilot was able to fully recover from the descent.