4 ms·
Effective learning: Twenty rules of formulating knowledge (1999)
- niea_11 8y agoAnother link to the same page that works: https://www.supermemo.com/articles/20rules.htm https://www.supermemo.com/articles/20rules.htm
- pure-awesome 8y agoDoesn't work for me.
- solarkraft 8y agoArchive.org has it: https://web.archive.org/web/20180906202316/https://www.supermemo.com/en/articles/20rules https://web.archive.org/web/20180906202316/https://www.super...
- jamesholden 8y agoPage isn't working for me: https://i.imgur.com/vr9zLtH.png https://i.imgur.com/vr9zLtH.png
- kk58 8y agoSame here
- TheJimMcKeeth 8y agoThe link works, but not if you follow it from here. https://www.supermemo.com/en/articles/20rul https://www.supermemo.com/en/articles/20rul
- pure-awesome 8y agoYou're right; clicking it fails but copy-pasting works. Weird, why would that be? EDIT: Well, copy-pasting opens the site but not the article.
- TheJimMcKeeth 8y agoFor some reason it got truncated https://www.supermemo.com/en/articles/20rules https://www.supermemo.com/en/articles/20rules
- treerock 8y ago"Do not learn if you do not understand" Seems strangely backward to me. Understanding is my end goal when learning.
- kuerbel 8y agoLearning is not the same as studying, but if English is not your mother tongue you can easily mistake one word for the other. e.g. in german it is the same word. I assume it was written by a polish native speaker. Apparently in polish they also only have on word for it - uczyć.
- Firadeoclus 8y agoThe material you're using to learn has two levels: the concepts it tries to explain, and the concepts used to explain them. For the material to be truly useful you already need to have an understanding of the latter. Some learning, of course, is by example/exposure rather than by explanation, otherwise you'd never be able to even get started.
- mamon 8y agoI see this as a warning against rote memorization.
- BeetleB 8y agoI tried using Mnemosyne (a Linux program that uses the same algorithm) years ago when I was in school, and did not find it effective. It was a pain to enter the cards, and a lot of my material was mathematical. Also, you needed to be really consistent. Take 2 weeks off and the algorithm behaved poorly. Looking back, I think the problem was the lack of documentation on what to expect. There are always questions of how many cards should you do in one session, and how you should rate them. A few days ago I started again, this time using org-drill. As with everything org-mode related, the experience is much better this time round. When it presents you a card, it has all the LaTeX rendered, and all images showing. Let's see if I don't get sick of it this time round.
- pixelperfect 8y agoUsing a spaced repetition system for math has never worked well for me. It's useful for memorizing mathematical facts (for example, the mean/variance of various statistical distributions), but over time my intuition will fade, and I'm left parroting facts, having lost the understanding of why they are true. In my experience, spaced repetition systems excel when I can create cards that take 10 seconds or less to answer. So they work really well for something like language learning. But it's difficult to reduce mathematical arguments into 10 second chunks.
- BeetleB 8y agoWhat you say is generally true for mathematics, but it can help for the basics: Definitions of terms, etc. Basically, my goal was/is to memorize the facts one really should know without needing to look it up. For example, I've learned statistics at least thrice in my life, and beyond the very basics, the material doesn't stick. I think it's good for retaining a minimum amount of knowledge that you can use in the field any time you need it. Things like the recursive rule for the Gamma function, or that pairwise independence does not imply mutual independence (although a better flashcard would ask you to recall an actual counterexample), or what each probability distribution is useful for (I don't think I'd ever want to memorize the mean/variance, though). I agree with you that overly relying on flashcards will take away the intuition, which is critical in fields like mathematics. At the same time, one can use flashcards in addition to other methods. It's not as if using one approach impacts your ability to learn via other approaches. Also, I think one can be clever in how they use them for mathematics. A lot of theorems rely on a certain key trick or two, so I think it makes sense to have flashcards asking what the trick is. I think flashcards are great for memorizing counterexamples, as well. Or heck, even regular examples. Depending on the branch of mathematics, knowing these is immensely helpful (e.g. in analysis). Having said all that, I'm not using it for math presently.
- jammygit 8y agoThis is an alternative link I've been using this week personally: http://super-memory.com/articles/20rules.htm http://super-memory.com/articles/20rules.htm I just wish the mobile supermemo version let you export your cards. I left supermemo a year ago for anki because of that - don't want to get locked in when I have thousands of cards. The windows version apparently does allow exports, but it seems separate from the web version and does not run on Linux.