4 ms·
The linked article at https://www.researchers.one/article/2018-10-6 https://www.researchers.one/article/2018-10-6 seems well-argued, nothing outlandish. It does
by it 8y ago
The linked article at https://www.researchers.one/article/2018-10-6 https://www.researchers.one/article/2018-10-6 seems well-argued, nothing outlandish. It doesn't talk about anything in quantum mechanics though. I was hoping to find that somewhere.
- SilasX 8y agoYeah, it doesn't seem fair to call someone a crank if they have a lucid point with a subtle, hard-to-spot flaw; such arguments are typically wrong in interesting, useful ways. Edit: At risk of self-congratulation, that's what I feel is happening to me on HN when I try to meticulously untangle a complicated issue where I feel people are talking past each other, and then get quickly downvoted but never responded to. Case in point: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14310444 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14310444
- DoctorOetker 8y agoI agree with you there, pointing out more precisely how people are talking past each other makes all sides pissed off...
- SilasX 8y agoWhoa, after my linking, that old comment went from -2 to -1! I thought it was way past the point that you could vote on it! (It's ~15 months old.)
- your-nanny 8y agoit's there. scroll down and click icons