8 ms·
> First, I tried free software alternatives, including Kdenlive, OpenShot, and a few more. Unfortunately, the audio effects available were a bit disappointing.
by kkapelon 8y ago
> First, I tried free software alternatives, including Kdenlive, OpenShot, and a few more. Unfortunately, the audio effects available were a bit disappointing. I use, at a minimum, normalization and a noise gate. Having a good compressor is a plus.
Audacity + Davinci resolve are fantastic. Both free and both available in Linux/Mac/Win
And both have noise reduction and compression that the author wants.
- mbrock 8y agoThe author is using "free software" in the free software movement sense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software Audacity is free software, but DaVinci Resolve is merely freeware.
- kkapelon 8y agoBut later he talks about Premiere pro. And according to him the problem was the workflow, and not the proprietary nature of the software. > I used Premiere Pro for a while and enjoyed the stability and quality of the tools, but I still suffered from the repetitive workload of cutting and organizing the video and audio clips to form my screencasts His example video in the website is also on Windows, so he is definitely using non-free software.