4 ms·
It mentions actions need to be private repos. So if I not mistaken free uses will not be able to use it.
by jordiee 8y ago
It mentions actions need to be private repos. So if I not mistaken free uses will not be able to use it.
- bnVi 8y agoWhere exactly does what say actions need to be in private repos? I'm not finding it. Edit: Seems like workflows can only be created in private repos [1], > You can only create workflows in private repositories. but actions can be public [2]. > To share GitHub Actions with the GitHub community, your repository must be public. [1] https://developer.github.com/actions/creating-workflows/creating-a-new-workflow/ https://developer.github.com/actions/creating-workflows/crea... [2] https://developer.github.com/actions/creating-github-actions/creating-a-new-action/ https://developer.github.com/actions/creating-github-actions...
- perlgeek 8y agoFound it about workflows at least: https://developer.github.com/actions/creating-workflows/creating-a-new-workflow/ https://developer.github.com/actions/creating-workflows/crea... > You can only create workflows in private repositories
- ilaksh 8y agoDoes this mean that Actions in general cannot be used for public open source projects? It seems like a lot of them could benefit from this. Maybe they need a new category of paid but still public.
- mwarkentin 8y agoMight be a security thing rather than money?
- jarfil 8y ago> Over time — and Lambert seemed to be in favor of this — GitHub could also allow developers to sell their workflows and Actions through the GitHub marketplace. Nope, it's about money.
- preya2k 8y agoSupposedly, this is only a restriction during the beta period. https://twitter.com/MoStueck/status/1052384517212725248 https://twitter.com/MoStueck/status/1052384517212725248