4 ms·
>>Hard to develop a space program when you're spending all your production fighting over scarce resources, plugging leaks, and attempting to feed a planet with
by kamaal 8y ago
>>Hard to develop a space program when you're spending all your production fighting over scarce resources, plugging leaks, and attempting to feed a planet with decreasing yields.
All the more reason to develop your space program.
At the risk of pointing to Movies, but yet, one of the underlying themes in the movie Interstellar is some day there will be no option but to leave.
So its about time we think seriously about mining asteroids, space colonies and having some kind of permanent self sustaining and growing colonies in space.
Sure Humans are still likely to have the same problems, but you have eliminated the biggest threat to our existence, and we now have thousands of years at our disposal to plan the next steps.
- goatlover 8y agoIt would take a whole lot for Earth to become less habital and more expensive than anywhere in space we can reach. Interstellar also included Matthew McConuhagh communicating quantum gravity info to his daughter in the past from inside a black hole. That’s not a realistic scenario.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- randcraw 8y agoAgreed. I loved "Interstellar", but leaving Earth is a hopeless prospect. How do you move 8 billion people to another planet when it costs a $billion to send just 5 people into Earth orbit? Worse, there's nowhere enough sunlight and water anywhere in this solar system to sustain more than a handful of people. No, if mankind can't make it here, we can't make it anywhere.
- kamaal 8y agoThe same way we explored the earth. Every one won't move at once. These are gradual things that unfold over decades to centuries.
- AstralStorm 8y agoSee, exploring Earth takes almost no energy, mostly time and will and supplies. Ships at super efficient. On the other hand, getting to 1st cosmic speed takes a lot of energy released in a relatively short burst or some kind of space elevator which we cannot build yet. You cannot make this "gradual" really. You either get to orbit or don't. The "gradual" phase of getting into space is done. We got to orbit. We need a major economy and scale breakthrough now or you cannot even try sending people off anywhere. So major that small improvements as done by SpaceX will not get there in centuries.
- sacrosurf 8y agoTotally agree. I have a couple visions of attainable infrastructure evolutions, we should have every city and county helping sponsor X Prizes that would help us attain incredible improvements: • elevate all city infrastructure up off the ground, 100 feet or more. If you figure that out you get arable, natural landscapes back and you keep your city too. • How to bring light down to the ground underneath it all? I say we build transparent canals, use their shape to lense light through and around. • these canals, there could be extra channels/tubes added to store and process dirty, utility and drinkable water • create food programs that bring growing, harvesting, finishing and cooking down into the crowds of us who’d want to participate. Can we reduce the cost of food by orders of magnitude?
- Dylan16807 8y agoWe can definitely colonize space. And we can make space travel vastly cheaper. But I'm extremely doubtful we would ever reach a point where moving everyone off of earth is easier than fixing whatever is broken with earth. Or that it would even get within a factor of 10.
- ahje 8y agoMoving everyone off-planet, no. Getting a presence up there, and creating off-planet production sites on the other hand, would be quite handy on the other hand. That way we could reduce the impact industrial production has on the planet.
- collinmanderson 8y agoRight, if it's possible to sustain a colony on mars, shouldn't it be even easier to sustain a colony on earth?