3 ms·
>Just seems honest to me. It is honest, but the developer is the one who put the "annoying" ads in in the first place. That feels like a real slap in the face
by na85 8y ago
>Just seems honest to me.
It is honest, but the developer is the one who put the "annoying" ads in in the first place.
That feels like a real slap in the face.
- Buge 8y agoThe developer put them in because the developer needs money to live. I don't think the economic reality of needing money to live is a slap in the face. One alternative would be to only have the pro version, not the free version. But that seems worse.
- na85 8y agoOnly having a paid version seems more honest to me. An adware version that purposely annoys your users seems like a fuck-you move.
- Dylan16807 8y agoIt's not doing anything to be annoying on purpose. It's just a fact of life that ads are annoying. If they could use non-annoying ads, I'm sure they would.