3 ms·
> Going for feature parity was a mistake But there was no feature parity, not even close. When G+ launched it was more like a tech demo, interest died down wh
by pantalaimon 8y ago
> Going for feature parity was a mistake
But there was no feature parity, not even close.
When G+ launched it was more like a tech demo, interest died down when people discovered that there really was not much to do.
They added more features over time, but at that point the hype was already dead.
- mindgam3 8y agoThey had the important stuff. Posting content, a feed, friends. This is what drove Facebook. All the other stuff was icing on the cake.
- pantalaimon 8y agoThere were no events, no pages. If I just want to chat with friends I might just a well use a messenger with a group chat.
- Aeolun 8y agoThe existence of core features does not a compelling argument for switching make.