3 ms·
Pretty much everyone working in the high-performance computing space has to think about this. If you produce something truly useful, it may find its way into us
by saltcured 8y ago
Pretty much everyone working in the high-performance computing space has to think about this. If you produce something truly useful, it may find its way into use in those kinds of HPC workloads. At the same time, much of our "civilian" use of HPC is being subsidized by those kinds of national security workloads which fund a lot of research and infrastructure.
You might also think about it positively. At least they are blowing up nukes in simulations instead of out in the desert somewhere upwind of a lot of people... speaking of upwind, there is also significant oil and gas funding behind a lot of geophysical science.
Addendum: as I recall, the Globus project was often funded by a mixture of NSF and DoE grants and a large part of its core group was based out of a midwestern national lab.
- dekhn 8y agoI never said I thought there was anything wrong with doing nuclear simulations testing. TBH I think it's an overall good. Globus was mostly run out of Argonne National Lab, but it existed primarily to support scientific computing and public research. We had a subcontract to build pyGlobus since so many people wanted a Python interface (the Globus team started in C++ and then switched to Java and a really, really bad RPC technology called SOAP with WSDL for schema). I've definitely come to terms with the modern compromise (in which a great deal of scientific research is motivated and funded by defense).