3 ms·
> The point is that you don't need any software layers at all to code up a basic neural network implementation. I grafted my answer to the wrong post, I meant
by MrUnderBridje 8y ago
> The point is that you don't need any software layers at all to code up a basic neural network implementation.
I grafted my answer to the wrong post, I meant to respond to the guy talking about the project implicitely using Numpy.
Offtopic remark: It would be nice to be able to move a post to a different thread, or make a single answer to several messages.
- mos_basik 8y ago>single answer to several messages Always surprises me that out of all the different kinds of internet communities, it's only the oft-maligned imageboards that consistently provide that feature. I was kind of expecting Discourse to play with the idea, since they seem to be the modern-reboot-of-forums with the most traction + willingness to experiment, but they haven't so far, afaik.
- spicytunacone 8y agoHow would you represent that? On HN and similar every response is its own thread. This is true with email as well, but I don't have experience with any significant threads or mailing lists. The naïve solution would be to just limit nesting and order nested comments chronologically. Another solution may be to CC @postid in your messages and have posts display "responding to: id1, id4" at the top and "responses: id91" at the bottom with appropriate links. There's a question here about which post to write or display your response under. Finally, an extravagant solution would be to really represent discussion as a graph and I think a lot of time would need to be spent creating an interface with minimal frustration as I feel it can get really involved (i.e., a lot of clicking). Curious what you or anyone else thinks.