3 ms·
Regarding Apple's denial, there are other publications that corroborate the Bloomberg story. Previously, Apple has denied security incidents even when multiple
by tristanj 8y ago
Regarding Apple's denial, there are other publications that corroborate the Bloomberg story. Previously, Apple has denied security incidents even when multiple outlets report it. For example, last year, The Information reported Apple discovered malware on Super Micro servers in their development and production environments [1]. As a result, the Information claimed that Apple ended up terminating its relationship with Super Micro.
In response to the report, an Apple spokesperson denied there was a security incident, stating: "We’re not aware of any data being transmitted to an unauthorized party nor was any infected firmware found on the servers purchased from this vendor."
However, based on sources from within Apple, Ars Technica claimed Apple employees did find compromised firmware in Apple's design lab. Super Micro SVP of Technology also reported Apple terminated its relationship with them.
I believe we are seeing the same situation here.
[1] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/02/apple-axed-supermicro-servers-from-datacenters-because-of-bad-firmware-update/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/02/apple...
- IBM 8y agoApple's denial references that report.
- tristanj 8y agoWhich makes it more curious. Last year, Apple PR denied existence of the security incident, but today they admitted it actually happened. That is a contradiction.
- ralfd 8y agoNo contradiction. Read it closely: The old statement said that no infected firmware was found on servers purchased from supermicro, meaning freshly purchased servers delivered from supermicro were clean. The ArsTechnica clarifies in an update to the article that the infected driver was installed later. The new statement says: "That one-time event was determined to be accidental and not a targeted attack against Apple."
- loufe 8y agoA good way to induce misdirection, no?