4 ms·

Maybe we both have loose morals but I don't see it as cheating the employer anymore than one "cheats" an employer by driving to work instead of walking.

• hon 8y ago
  >I don't see it as cheating the employer anymore than one "cheats" an employer by driving to work instead of walking Can you expand on this? I don't understand the anology
  • reificator 8y ago
    It seems like they're accounting for commute in hours worked, which doesn't make any sense. Perhaps they're saying that the employer has to (indirectly) pay for a parking lot to accommodate them?
    • pbhjpbhj 8y ago
      I'd say it's that driving is easier for you, but they get the same result - you attend as necessary. They shouldn't care how you get there as long as you do your job.