3 ms·
I’m not justifying their lack of efforts for Linux users but I can understand why they limit their resources towards creating better drivers. According to Wikip
by anontechworker 8y ago
I’m not justifying their lack of efforts for Linux users but I can understand why they limit their resources towards creating better drivers. According to Wikipedia(1), the amount of Linux usage worldwide is barely even a blip compared to windows + macOS. From a business standpoint, it’s hard to see the benefits of correcting these issues.
1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_sys...
- setr 8y agoOfc, thats a self-fulfilling prophecy: nvidia should never see high usage in linux if they’re not spending money there, except by accident (ie a cheap, good card also happens to be cracked open enough for good open source drivers to be written, or something like bitcoin crops up again, and linux/nvidia is necessary enough that people use it despite the shoddy drivers). But it always has to be because the lack of interest by nvidia was overcome
- Keyframe 8y agoWhat I don't understand is how come driver for their cards works just fine on Windows AND MacOS then? Maybe it isn't Nvidia at fault alone here? TBH, I only had problems installing their drivers on Linux, but once they were up and running all was/is good... Except Wayland. But, wayland's gonna way no matter what, so no Wayland for me.
- lasagnaphil 8y agoAlthough it doesn’t matter to gamers buying GPUs solely for gaming, it really matters for a lot of the researchers (not just computer science, but any major that uses GPU computing), and also the professionals (using CAD and other software). They are also buying those high-end GPUs alongside the gamers, and are constantly irritated by shaky Linux nvidia drivers. If AMD gets enough support for high-performance computing (ex. deep learning), then researchers might be more inclined to switch to AMD...