3 ms·

Yes, I am sure, or I wouldn't have mentioned it. Not everyone uses Thunderbird. (I use Mail.app for OS X and roundcube webmail. Both display them as attachments

by liedra 16y ago

Yes, I am sure, or I wouldn't have mentioned it. Not everyone uses Thunderbird. (I use Mail.app for OS X and roundcube webmail. Both display them as attachments.) tbh, I don't pay attention to priority ever, since the only people who use it when they email me are spammers. So the moral is: not everyone uses the same client as you, and not everyone uses email the same way as you. To piss off the least number of people, go for a lowest common denominator thing. This is also why I always use plain text email.

pbhjpbhj 16y ago
Do you use lynx for browsing the web too?
- liedra 16y ago
  Sorry, what's that got to do with anything? Email is not the same as web browsing. You can't compare the two.
  - pbhjpbhj 16y ago
    Curiousity - I used links2 for a while, it's like lynx with images and some minimal js support. Anyhow, I find images in email incredibly useful - it makes it an extra couple of steps for a lot of things if one has to upload or serve an image and the recipient then has to follow a link to get images. What area of work are you in? Not big on branding? I'll have to get some time with Mail.app, does it make no distinction between inline images and attachments either? How about encoded images that are inlined - do they show as attachments too? I do know that OSX handles vcards very well so I'm kinda surprised it treats them as straight attachments but still don't think that matters so much.
    - liedra 16y ago
      Sorry, only just got back to comments today. I'm in academia, so yes, not big on branding. The only attachments I like to receive are papers, calls for papers, agendas, student work, stuff like that. These tend to be important and can get lost in the pile if every email comes with an attachment. Mail.app handles any attachments as attachments (even inline ones). If images are linked to as part of HTML email it will display them (but not by default due to spam tracking -- you have to click a button to display them), and not count them as attachments though.

by liedra 16y ago

pbhjpbhj 16y ago

Do you use lynx for browsing the web too?

liedra 16y ago
Sorry, what's that got to do with anything? Email is not the same as web browsing. You can't compare the two.
- pbhjpbhj 16y ago
  Curiousity - I used links2 for a while, it's like lynx with images and some minimal js support. Anyhow, I find images in email incredibly useful - it makes it an extra couple of steps for a lot of things if one has to upload or serve an image and the recipient then has to follow a link to get images. What area of work are you in? Not big on branding? I'll have to get some time with Mail.app, does it make no distinction between inline images and attachments either? How about encoded images that are inlined - do they show as attachments too? I do know that OSX handles vcards very well so I'm kinda surprised it treats them as straight attachments but still don't think that matters so much.
  - liedra 16y ago
    Sorry, only just got back to comments today. I'm in academia, so yes, not big on branding. The only attachments I like to receive are papers, calls for papers, agendas, student work, stuff like that. These tend to be important and can get lost in the pile if every email comes with an attachment. Mail.app handles any attachments as attachments (even inline ones). If images are linked to as part of HTML email it will display them (but not by default due to spam tracking -- you have to click a button to display them), and not count them as attachments though.