5 ms·
I don't think it's sexist to target men for a job posting. You know the job, you know what it entails and you know what works behaviorally and physically. Ther
by pteredactyl 8y ago
I don't think it's sexist to target men for a job posting.
You know the job, you know what it entails and you know what works behaviorally and physically. There are differences between genders. That's okay.
I do think it's sexist to not hire a qualified women for the job because she's a women ( esp. in the garbage collector scenario). Like you hate women or something and you don't hire them ( funny story I heard a women on the sidewalk casually say she hated men. Never heard a man say that... ) The same for the flipside.
I do think it's a sexist double standard to say it's not okay to target men for a job and not mention anything about the flipside: it's okay to only target women.
- JamisonM 8y agoThe law says that it is "sexist" (i.e. discrimination) to target advertising in a way that denies qualified women the opportunity to apply for a particular job. In the end the net result of targeting only men is the same as refusing to hire women, it denies otherwise qualified women opportunities that they are deserving of. That this has a cost is understood by those who wrote the law, they decided those costs are worth it.
- pteredactyl 8y agoWhich law specifically states what you say? It's one thing to target a gender in your advertisement. It's another to deny someone a job based on their gender.
- ggggtez 8y agoNo women ever saw the ad, so how could they apply? The courts have ruled it's the same as denying qualified people the job. The opportunity was unfairly hidden from them. Imagine the job posting was in the men's toilet. The company would have a hard time arguing women had fair notice.
- bduerst 8y ago>Which law specifically states what you say? Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- pteredactyl 8y agoI read it. Couldn't find mention of advertisement or solicitation for jobs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
- bduerst 8y agoThat's a summary wiki article, more detail here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact also: https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/09/18/technology/ap-us-tec-facebook-discrimination-complaint.html https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/09/18/technology/ap-us... >Targeting job ads by gender is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- pteredactyl 8y agoI'll take a look. Thanks
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- pbhjpbhj 8y ago"There are differences between genders." For sure. But you're not hiring a sex, you're hiring a person and individuals can match requirements for almost all types of position regardless of sex.
- thecopy 8y agoSo if i have a job that requires a man, why should i be coerced into paying for showing the ads for women?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- pbhjpbhj 8y ago>for almost all types of position You shouldn't IMO. However, you should also understand that people do get jobs through other people seeing adverts - so worth bearing in mind.
- weberc2 8y agoYes, but advertising can only reasonably target demographics, not individuals.