11 ms·
I'm skeptical of that theory. Sunspot is up in the Lincoln National Forest. There are multiple trails and locations that have a great view of White Sands and Ho
by RandomNick 8y ago
I'm skeptical of that theory. Sunspot is up in the Lincoln National Forest. There are multiple trails and locations that have a great view of White Sands and Holloman AFB, which are located in the basin below. There isn't anything special about the view from Sunspot that I can recall.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- subcosmos 8y agoOther than a big telescope great for looking at things far away? I used to work in astrophysics. Telescope operators are expected not to look in certain places. Those were fun conversations. My guess is they found a spy.
- yasp 8y agoWhat kinds of places were you told not to look? (I'm guessing you couldn't physically point it at targets on the ground, so I assume certain sections of the sky.) Who was it that was commanding you not to look?
- subcosmos 8y agoI won't elaborate. A neat book just came out though : Accessory to War: The Unspoken Alliance Between Astrophysics and the Military https://g.co/kgs/XdRZFu https://g.co/kgs/XdRZFu
- projectileboy 8y agoThanks for the link. I haven't seen the book, but I know when I took a computational physics class as an undergrad (~25 years ago), there was a definite overlap between the modeling necessary to understand stellar collapse, and the modeling necessary to build better nuclear weapons.
- linksnapzz 8y agoA late friend who worked on type II supernova simulations was once invited to talk about his team's software with some gentlemen at an NNSA lab, Los Alamos or Livermore or Sandia (I forget which one.) At the conclusion of the talk, the DOE guys said appreciative things about the current work, but also pointed out that certain avenues of investigation into certain characteristics might lead to the gov't declaring this software classified, and restricting who might have access to it. My friend was at the time not a US citizen, so he would have been locked out of contributing to his own work. "Nice piece of software you have there, would be a shame if something...happened to it..."
- Sephr 8y agoDid they attempt to open source the software?
- subcosmos 8y agoHopefully not
- linksnapzz 8y agoIIRC, the code in question was written under an NSF grant, and probably not that hard to obtain.
- eesmith 8y agoThere's a story about a US astrophysicist grad student working on stellar evolution. A visiting Soviet scientist came to give a talk. At the end the student asked a question about one aspect of the talk, something like, how do you know the plasma is transparent to photons at that temperature? The visiting Russian just said "it is." Later, the grad student mentioned it, quizzically, to his advisor. His advisor pointed out that it was something that came out of nuclear bomb research. I looked, but could not find that anecdote.
- AnimalMuppet 8y agoSince subcosmos won't answer, I'll take a guess: Spy satellites.
- lawlessone 8y agoAnyone can look at those though, they can't really hide them
- baq 8y agoNot every hobbyist had access to 1m+ mirrors, though. I imagine you could take a reasonably revealing picture of eg an Orion: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(satellite) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(satellite)
- DoctorOetker 8y agoI don't understand this thread. Sure with enough effort and manpower you can prevennt your own civilians from discovering these. How would the US government stop civilian entities in say Russia or China from discovering these? I still see a marginal potential utility though: not showing adversaries that you have noticed their satellites (in order to prevent them from improving their stealth).
- hindsightbias 8y agoPeople have done a lot with less than 1m. http://www.satobs.org/telescope.html http://www.satobs.org/telescope.html https://satelliteobservation.net/2017/04/20/observing-satellites/ https://satelliteobservation.net/2017/04/20/observing-satell...
- adwi 8y agoI gasped when I read their main antenna is 330’ wide.
- codewritinfool 8y agoNot as easily if they're equipped with this: http://www.bisbos.com/space_misty.html http://www.bisbos.com/space_misty.html
- evil-olive 8y agoI work adjacent to some satellites that do visual-spectrum imaging of the earth, and even we fall under these regulations. In addition to all the NOAA licensing for imaging the ground, you need extra licenses for taking pictures of space. (it's useful, for example, to image the moon as a way of calibrating cameras & telescopes without atmospheric interference, and tracking stars is one of the most reliable ways to determine spacecraft attitude) One of the requirements is that if we take a picture of space and there's anything moving in the picture (presumably a near-earth satellite), we delete all copies of the picture and forget we ever took it, but only after offering it for sale to the Air Force at a commercially reasonable price. I'm sure there are additional layers on top of it, that's just the facets of it that I've been exposed to in the mandatory company-wide regulatory training.
- Cthulhu_ 8y ago> but only after offering it for sale to the Air Force at a commercially reasonable price. That sounds like a business model - what is a commercially reasonable price, and where do I sign up?
- dragonwriter 8y ago> That sounds like a business model Does it? You have one potential customer, and you have to create product on spec, offer it to them at a price you don't control, and destroy the unsold material whether or not the one customer pays for a copy. Building a viable business model around that without corrupt influence over the single buyer seems impractical.
- closeparen 8y agoSure, the US has considerable leverage over the sorts of things people are allowed to launch into space, but I have a hard time believing it could maintain a similar degree of control over ground-based telescopes.
- AnimalMuppet 8y agoWasn't Sunspot a solar observatory? Wouldn't its telescope be set up for light levels that would make viewing anything on the ground rather problematic?
- subcosmos 8y agoIts a coverup to prevent the public from learning that the sun is actually flat.
- tclancy 8y agoEverybody knows that, how do you think night works? It's when it spins around us and shows its back.
- subcosmos 8y agoShhhh .... at least don't tell them about the giant space turtles Edit: nice username ;)
- DoctorOetker 8y agoapproximately flat, a big hole in the heavenous sphere, not sure if flat or curved makes sense for a hole
- RandomNick 8y agoSure, but it's a big telescope mostly buried in the ground designed to look at the sun. Not sure how much use it could possibly be in relation to its proximity to White Sands and/or Holloman.
- subcosmos 8y agoThere are multiple telescopes there. Solar observatories need to track the sun, so they use a little mirror (heliostat) at the tunnel entrance that changes angle to track the sun, so you can point it anywhere. http://www.astropixels.com/observatories/KPNO/KP80-127.html http://www.astropixels.com/observatories/KPNO/KP80-127.html
- Zak 8y agoI am curious as to what would happen if an organization that owned a large telescope was unwilling to cooperate with such a request.
- toss1 8y agoit'd likely have something to do with a long-term non-optional residency as guest of the government in Leavenworth, Kansas
- Zak 8y agoWhat law would this violate? Please be specific, as legal definitions of things like espionage are often not as broad as a layperson might guess (and on occasion, they're broader).
- dragonwriter 8y ago> What law would this violate? Once the party was informed, and thus had knowledge, of the national defense sensitivity involves, it would seem arguably to facially violate the Espionage Act of 1917, as amended; in particular, 18 USC §§ 793, 795, and, if they attempt to publish the pictures, 797, and/or, if the order originates with NASA, 799. Specific enough?
- closeparen 8y agoThere's no way prosecutors and courts would actually commit to an Espionage Act conviction of an astronomer for looking at the wrong part of the sky. That's absurd.
- toss1 8y agoLooking? No Photographing and publishing or sending to unauthorized parties foreign or domestic, bet on it. You might get away with a stern visit from one of the 3-letter-agencies if it's minor importance and ignorance, but do it again... If you doubt it, please do the test and report back the results.