4 ms·
Not that I doubt that they're right about this data point, but interesting choice of source... appears to be some sort of climate-change-denial organization?
by dbatten 8y ago
Not that I doubt that they're right about this data point, but interesting choice of source... appears to be some sort of climate-change-denial organization?
- colechristensen 8y agoThe link is to something maybe questionable, but the information source is the EIA, the same graph is on the front page of https://www.eia.gov/ https://www.eia.gov/
- e12e 8y ago<sarcasm ahead /> Isn't that some sort of climate-change-denial organization now? I wonder if this mean the US will stop making war on oil rich nations, and instead have to contend with invasions now? Would certainly be a change. (in all seriousness, I'm not advocating wars of agression on anyone - for natural resources or other reasons)
- colechristensen 8y agoMore like another Russian revolution dragging in old satellites or a regional war in the middle-east. Less wars of aggression and more overthrowing the powers which were held there by oil profits. Mix in world powers trying to "help" and we've got something coming.
- singularity2001 8y agosame thought here *.gov == (risk of) denial % these days
- bmurray7jhu 8y agoDirect link to page with cited graph: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=37053 https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=37053