3 ms·
Should they? You're technically correct but... 1) All the Microsoft haters are going to latch on to this and cite it as an example of how truly evil is regard
by cptskippy 8y ago
Should they? You're technically correct but...
1) All the Microsoft haters are going to latch on to this and cite it as an example of how truly evil is regardless.
2) It might stir the pot enough to encourage Microsoft to reconsider.
- admax88q 8y agoSo we should be intentionally misleading because it might rile people up to take action that we want? Almost like how Fox News has intentionally misleading news to rile up conservatives?
- cptskippy 8y agoIsn't becoming hostile and outraged the norm these days as response to just about anything you disagree with?
- Dylan16807 8y ago> 1) All the Microsoft haters are going to latch on to this and cite it as an example of how truly evil is regardless. I don't understand. Why should this not be cited? They shipped this code to their customers. A limited release doesn't mean it unhappened.
- cptskippy 8y agoThose customers signed up for it. It wasn't a random sampling. It's similar to running a Firefox Nightly or being part of an open Beta. Microsoft's Insider program is an opt in where you get to try out potential features. There's a history of features being pulled from the channel, their Sets feature was pulled in June.
- Dylan16807 8y agoThat's a fine reason to discount bugs, and realize nothing is set in stone. But this is an intentional feature, and the problem is the intent itself.