4 ms·

Non-AMP link; https://www.pcmag.com/news/363619/protonvpn-and-nordvpn-bugs-left-windows-vulnerable-to-hacker https://www.pcmag.com/news/363619/protonvpn-and-nor

by retox 8y ago

Non-AMP link; https://www.pcmag.com/news/363619/protonvpn-and-nordvpn-bugs-left-windows-vulnerable-to-hacker https://www.pcmag.com/news/363619/protonvpn-and-nordvpn-bugs...

craftyguy 8y ago
I know folks around here hate AMP stuff, but tell me which one of these is more readable than the other: https://imgtc.com/a/XyS61Ej https://imgtc.com/a/XyS61Ej
- client4 8y ago
  My hate for walled gardens exceeds my annoyance at non-optimized mobile sites ;)
  - craftyguy 8y ago
    I actually agree with you. My point is not that the original is not optimized for mobile, but that it sucks hard for desktop. I wish there were an open, non-AMP way to remove the crap that AMP removes.
    - kijin 8y ago
      Reader view on Firefox does this beautifully without the need for any middleman. Client-side solutions are the way to go.
- Dylan16807 8y ago
  I like this one, to be honest: https://i.imgur.com/j6ZnWkH.png https://i.imgur.com/j6ZnWkH.png That gray background is not great. (Though it looks different to me on amp. Weird.)
  - craftyguy 8y ago
    > That gray background is not great. That's the default background color I set for my browser when a site does not specify a background. I like it more than staring at blinding white #FFF.
- pvg 8y ago
  I know folks around here hate AMP stuff I think just about everyone must be developing some very strong negative feelings about having a boring, offtopic debate about AMP in any AMP-unrelated post that happens to contain an AMP link. Please don't start more of them.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
dang 8y ago
Thanks. Changed from https://www-pcmag-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.pcmag.com/news/363619/protonvpn-and-nordvpn-bugs-left-windows-vulnerable-to-hacker?amp=1&amp_js_v=0.1#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcmag.com%2Fnews%2F363619%2Fprotonvpn-and-nordvpn-bugs-left-windows-vulnerable-to-hacker https://www-pcmag-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.pcmag.com/n....

by retox 8y ago

Non-AMP link; https://www.pcmag.com/news/363619/protonvpn-and-nordvpn-bugs-left-windows-vulnerable-to-hacker https://www.pcmag.com/news/363619/protonvpn-and-nordvpn-bugs...

craftyguy 8y ago

I know folks around here hate AMP stuff, but tell me which one of these is more readable than the other: https://imgtc.com/a/XyS61Ej https://imgtc.com/a/XyS61Ej

client4 8y ago
My hate for walled gardens exceeds my annoyance at non-optimized mobile sites ;)
- craftyguy 8y ago
  I actually agree with you. My point is not that the original is not optimized for mobile, but that it sucks hard for desktop. I wish there were an open, non-AMP way to remove the crap that AMP removes.
  - kijin 8y ago
    Reader view on Firefox does this beautifully without the need for any middleman. Client-side solutions are the way to go.
Dylan16807 8y ago
I like this one, to be honest: https://i.imgur.com/j6ZnWkH.png https://i.imgur.com/j6ZnWkH.png That gray background is not great. (Though it looks different to me on amp. Weird.)
- craftyguy 8y ago
  > That gray background is not great. That's the default background color I set for my browser when a site does not specify a background. I like it more than staring at blinding white #FFF.
pvg 8y ago
I know folks around here hate AMP stuff I think just about everyone must be developing some very strong negative feelings about having a boring, offtopic debate about AMP in any AMP-unrelated post that happens to contain an AMP link. Please don't start more of them.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]

dang 8y ago

Thanks. Changed from https://www-pcmag-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.pcmag.com/news/363619/protonvpn-and-nordvpn-bugs-left-windows-vulnerable-to-hacker?amp=1&amp_js_v=0.1#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcmag.com%2Fnews%2F363619%2Fprotonvpn-and-nordvpn-bugs-left-windows-vulnerable-to-hacker https://www-pcmag-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.pcmag.com/n....