4 ms·
It is so damn difficult to prove substantial damages to be directly attributable to a specific data leak. It isn't right, but it also isn't reasonable to attrib
by reilly3000 8y ago
It is so damn difficult to prove substantial damages to be directly attributable to a specific data leak. It isn't right, but it also isn't reasonable to attribute a specific identity theft incident to a specific leak. My data has been compromised by at least 1 dozen corporations in the past 3 years. Whom is to be held accountable if my identity is compromised or my opinion influenced maliciously as a result of a breach?
It isn't as it this data has some chain of custody that can show which actor sold it to another and whom used it for a spearfishing campaign. Our secrets are laid bare to whomever has the will to partake of them.
Sometimes I wonder why it is considered immutable that human malice is an unstoppable force. I want my kids to live in a world where those who leak data and those that use it to malign others are rare and held accountable in a manner that is truly commensurate with their cost.
- Aeolun 8y agoIt _is_ rare. But that doesn’t mean those who let your data leak should go unpunished. You don’t need to figure out who was the cause of a specific misuse, you just punish the data being leaked in the first place. Though I guess you need to figure out a way for companies not to hide the leak then.