5 ms·
The NYT knows better. They know that you can unmask someone by finding correlations in style. They most likely edited the content heavily to avoid this. Beside
by d--b 8y ago
The NYT knows better. They know that you can unmask someone by finding correlations in style. They most likely edited the content heavily to avoid this.
Besides, correlations with tweets probably wouldn’t mean much as tweets are not written the same way as regular text and not by the same person anyway.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- harry8 8y agoYou're assuming the NYT doesn't want the person to be unmasked. "Sure we'll publish it anonymously Sir." While mumbling to themselves it won't work out how you think it will, though, but we will do it just as we said and we won't leak it either.
- koolba 8y ago> The NYT knows better. While I know that one word quips are verboten here I can’t resist ... ha!
- Redoubts 8y agoA member of the editorial board said that they wouldn’t do that with the Op Ed https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-daily/id1200361736?mt=2&i=1000419221554 https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-daily/id1200361736?m... Question asked at around 17:00
- ry4n413 8y agoMakes you wonder if this led them to plant decoy phrases/words.