3 ms·
I am quickly losing confidence in Google's ability to do hardware. Google Home is the only bright point on an otherwise terrible landscape of hardware releases.
by hunta2097 8y ago
I am quickly losing confidence in Google's ability to do hardware. Google Home is the only bright point on an otherwise terrible landscape of hardware releases.
Pixel 1 : Great phone but they just couldn't keep the supply chain filled.
Pixel 2 : see above.
Android Wear / Wear OS : Version 1.x solved all the problems of early Android handsets, by Google taking control of the firmware. Version 2.x completely crippled existing watches to the point of making them unusable. I think this was in a bid to gain more iPhone users.
Pixel 3 : It's not out yet and it's already being slated for having a huge notch. Let's hope they can make enough this time.
Google is to hardware what Sony Pictures is to movies. You get the odd great release but generally they're bogus.
- ehsankia 8y agoTo be fair, most other top hardware makers they're being compared to have been in the game for decades. And even then, the flaws were never that big. The biggest one so far has been a screen that shifts blue on tilt, but Apple and Samsung (the two biggest and best hardware makers out there) have had bigger issues (exploding phones, bending phones, reception issues, etc). Also not sure why you randomly mention Android Wear, which to this point is purely software for Google, in the middle of a hardware comment.
- hunta2097 8y agoGoogle took a much tighter hold of the reins with regard to Wear hardware. Google releases the firmware binaries, unlike in Android.
- tw04 8y ago>Google Home is the only bright point I'd say even that is questionable. Their insistence on using two microphones with "superior software" looks great on paper. Reality is it's significantly less sensitive than Alexa/echo in practice.