4 ms·
Big Changes for Mainstream Chip Architectures
- ramshanker 8y agoArticle is about increasing the performance per watt. Before reading, I guessed it was about lowering the "Non Recurring Expenses" of chip design. Currently that is the part keeping enthusiast away. Once we reach any kind of 3D-printing style on demand layout, we will have a github of chip design.
- mmirate 8y agoAt the moment, Tempo Automation[1] is probably the closest thing to the goal you describe. [1]: https://www.tempoautomation.com https://www.tempoautomation.com
- marcosdumay 8y agoCustom circuit assembly has been available for decades, and if everything else fails, can be done at home. It also has no relation at all with chip fabrication.
- mechagodzilla 8y agoFor all practical purposes we have that - they’re called FPGAs. For digital logic, the performance you can get out of an FPGA is as good as any low cost effort to actually fabricate a chip would ever be. Websites like opencores.org even sort of have what you’re talking about, but in general, logic design takes a lot of effort to be better than a general purpose chip that has had an insane amount of effort put into it. Also, no one wants to spend the effort the verify that the designs are actually right. Opencores is mostly full of half finished student projects, and has been as long as it’s existed.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- zengid 8y agoLooked at from another angle, these changes shift the nexus for innovation from manufacturing and process technology to architecture and design on the front end, and to post-manufacturing packaging on the back end