3 ms·
I've replayed the video about a dozen times now, and I see absolutely nothing where you marked - nothing that moves, and nothing that looks like a shelter. The
by dTal 8y ago
I've replayed the video about a dozen times now, and I see absolutely nothing where you marked - nothing that moves, and nothing that looks like a shelter.
There is a small judder, when the camera pans, which I attribute to a compression artifact.
It's difficult to tell the camera scale from the images, but judging by the tufts of grass (and the balloon earlier in the video) that area is quite small - those rocks are perhaps the height of a human. I would think that a shelter would be very obvious at that scale.
<edit> I see the movement now, after kicking up the resolution on YouTube. The scale is more obvious with hi res as well. I'm definitely calling it a blade of grass.
- anotheryou 8y agoThe marked small dot definitely moves. Maybe just too small to be seen on a phone screen?
- EdwardDiego 8y agoI can see it when I full-screened the video on a 1920 x 1080 display.
- TeMPOraL 8y agoYup, clearly visible on full-screen at 2650x1440; in windowed standard YouTube size I couldn't spot it either. Doesn't look like a compression artifact to me (though there is an artificial-looking jump at the exact moment the camera/drone rotates).
- weaksauce 8y agolooks like a leaf in the wind to me or perhaps a small bird.
- delbel 8y agoI see absolutely nothing
- adventured 8y agoAt 5:13-5:17 in the video you can see the thing moving in the the black void area of those rocks, where the parent marked the image. The problem is, the drone proceeds to produce another better top-down view as it moves over top of the thing in question - it has little to no consequential mass (something akin to a fat reed), it's plainly not a person. Full screen at max resolution helps a lot.