6 ms·

I see it, but I think the motion looks more like something swaying in the wind. I marked it in a screenshot here: https://i.imgur.com/w38bGrR.jpg https://i.img

I see it, but I think the motion looks more like something swaying in the wind. I marked it in a screenshot here: https://i.imgur.com/w38bGrR.jpg https://i.imgur.com/w38bGrR.jpg link to the scene here: https://youtu.be/gNZa8Ug-e40?t=309 https://youtu.be/gNZa8Ug-e40?t=309

dTal 8y ago
I've replayed the video about a dozen times now, and I see absolutely nothing where you marked - nothing that moves, and nothing that looks like a shelter. There is a small judder, when the camera pans, which I attribute to a compression artifact. It's difficult to tell the camera scale from the images, but judging by the tufts of grass (and the balloon earlier in the video) that area is quite small - those rocks are perhaps the height of a human. I would think that a shelter would be very obvious at that scale. <edit> I see the movement now, after kicking up the resolution on YouTube. The scale is more obvious with hi res as well. I'm definitely calling it a blade of grass.
- anotheryou 8y ago
  The marked small dot definitely moves. Maybe just too small to be seen on a phone screen?
- EdwardDiego 8y ago
  I can see it when I full-screened the video on a 1920 x 1080 display.
  - TeMPOraL 8y ago
    Yup, clearly visible on full-screen at 2650x1440; in windowed standard YouTube size I couldn't spot it either. Doesn't look like a compression artifact to me (though there is an artificial-looking jump at the exact moment the camera/drone rotates).
  - weaksauce 8y ago
    looks like a leaf in the wind to me or perhaps a small bird.
- delbel 8y ago
  I see absolutely nothing
  - adventured 8y ago
    At 5:13-5:17 in the video you can see the thing moving in the the black void area of those rocks, where the parent marked the image. The problem is, the drone proceeds to produce another better top-down view as it moves over top of the thing in question - it has little to no consequential mass (something akin to a fat reed), it's plainly not a person. Full screen at max resolution helps a lot.
tschwimmer 8y ago
I see it too and agree that it looks like the wind. The movement is too fluttery to be human movement. Too much irregular back and forth.
ryanmarsh 8y ago
Could see it clearly on 5k 27" monitor. That's something alive, not foliage. Could have been a small animal but it's hard to gauge the scale.
projektir 8y ago
I definitely see something, but at a loss as to what the something is. But it seems like it shouldn't be that hard to go back to that spot and investigate more?

dTal 8y ago

I've replayed the video about a dozen times now, and I see absolutely nothing where you marked - nothing that moves, and nothing that looks like a shelter. There is a small judder, when the camera pans, which I attribute to a compression artifact. It's difficult to tell the camera scale from the images, but judging by the tufts of grass (and the balloon earlier in the video) that area is quite small - those rocks are perhaps the height of a human. I would think that a shelter would be very obvious at that scale. <edit> I see the movement now, after kicking up the resolution on YouTube. The scale is more obvious with hi res as well. I'm definitely calling it a blade of grass.

anotheryou 8y ago
The marked small dot definitely moves. Maybe just too small to be seen on a phone screen?
EdwardDiego 8y ago
I can see it when I full-screened the video on a 1920 x 1080 display.
- TeMPOraL 8y ago
  Yup, clearly visible on full-screen at 2650x1440; in windowed standard YouTube size I couldn't spot it either. Doesn't look like a compression artifact to me (though there is an artificial-looking jump at the exact moment the camera/drone rotates).
- weaksauce 8y ago
  looks like a leaf in the wind to me or perhaps a small bird.
delbel 8y ago
I see absolutely nothing
- adventured 8y ago
  At 5:13-5:17 in the video you can see the thing moving in the the black void area of those rocks, where the parent marked the image. The problem is, the drone proceeds to produce another better top-down view as it moves over top of the thing in question - it has little to no consequential mass (something akin to a fat reed), it's plainly not a person. Full screen at max resolution helps a lot.

tschwimmer 8y ago

I see it too and agree that it looks like the wind. The movement is too fluttery to be human movement. Too much irregular back and forth.

ryanmarsh 8y ago

Could see it clearly on 5k 27" monitor. That's something alive, not foliage. Could have been a small animal but it's hard to gauge the scale.

projektir 8y ago

I definitely see something, but at a loss as to what the something is. But it seems like it shouldn't be that hard to go back to that spot and investigate more?