4 ms·
> This suggests that a high revenue share of a software sale is viable in a way that a high revenue share of a truck load is not. This is a good point. But I
by kartan 8y ago
> This suggests that a high revenue share of a software sale is viable in a way that a high revenue share of a truck load is not.
This is a good point. But I would rather see this apps more highly taxed than to allow monopolistic empires to grow.
- 1123581321 8y agoSorry, are you saying you’d like App Store software taxed enough that sales are low and it’s not viable for Apple to make money, forcing them to allow an unregulated open market if they want a meaningful number of apps on their phones? It’s an interesting idea, but I think the opportunity cost early on would have been that entire software market. And the opportunity cost now would be killing a large percentage of businesses that sell software to that market that can’t afford to handle distribution themselves. This quickly gets into the debate about whether it’s better to have large and many small companies or no large and few small companies.
- kartan 8y ago> Sorry, are you saying you’d like App Store software taxed enough that sales are low and it’s not viable for Apple to make money, forcing them to allow an unregulated open market if they want a meaningful number of apps on their phones? No. :)
- 1123581321 8y ago:) Well, what are you saying? I seriously don’t understand what you meant.