6 ms·

37 minutes of rework per car doesn't sound like very much. It would be interesting to know what fraction of the total time that is.

dgritsko 8y ago
37 minutes * 4300 cars = 2,651 hours of work.
- strig 8y ago
  So basically one full time employee for a year.
  - anticensor 8y ago
    It depends on what parts need rework. It may not be doable by one employee.
  - chipotle_coyote 8y ago
    If it's $80K a week, isn't that more like ~50 full-time employees for a year?
    - strig 8y ago
      Oh I didn't realize it was per week. You're right.
- jakelarkin 8y ago
  2,651 hours/week * $30/hour = ~$80k/week. on a volume of cars that brings in $200m/week. so what? its a minor inefficiency.
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
  - LoSboccacc 8y ago
    not really. each rework is the equivalent of a branching prediction failure in a very very long cpu pipeline. all tasks are massively parallelized in a production line. to reach 5000 car month tesla need to crank a car every seven minutes. now imagine a production line that pump a car out every seven minutes and you need 37 minutes manual labor for each of them the inefficence doesn't look so minor. it's also a logisticsl nightmare, just imagine parking all those cars while the rework stations free up.
    - zaroth 8y ago
      In the time it takes one person to do the 37 minutes of rework you have taken 5 more cars off the line. So 6 mechanics in 6 bays at the end of the line do the rework jobs and cars continue to flow out of the plant one every 7 minutes. An extra $20 in COGS per car. Is this really so horrible? What am I missing? Even if it’s 10 mechanics and 10 drivers moving cars into and out of the bays, with some bays idle some of the time and let’s call it an extra $60 in COGS. Their gross margin is already way better than anyone expected to see on the Model 3, they used some very impressive electrical design to save in so many places. Even just their rear view mirror is more than $50 cheaper than the competition’s mirrors because of their smart electrical design. [1] Right now they need volume more than anything else. Speaking as a reservation holder. [1] - https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-3-solidly-profitable-sandy-munro/ https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-3-solidly-profitable-s...
      - LoSboccacc 8y ago
        > What am I missing? just on top on my mind tooling, factory space, training, burnout, turns, above average defects that will have to be handled by the post sales network. > they used some very impressive electrical design oh yes they are brilliant car, no question about that. it's less impressive when you get an engineering marvel and the build quality is random depending on the hands that worked on it in post processing.
    - dmurray 8y ago
      > the inefficence doesn't look so minor. it's also a logisticsl nightmare, just imagine parking all those cars while the rework stations free up. To park a car every seven minutes? Maybe one extra full time employee?
  - falcolas 8y ago
    Per employee doing rework. To complete tasks which involve taking pieces off and putting them back on in ~30 minutes, you're probably looking at up to 10 people (for example, changing a bushing on a Mercedes that requires the complete disassembly of the rear of the car is around 6 hours of labor). As a point of comparison, large car manufacturers get into the "how much would a lawsuit and recall cost" when discussing adding costs of $4-$5 per car.
- kingbirdy 8y ago
  Per [0] it seems like line workers make ~$20/hr, so that's over $50,000 per week to fix the cars, not including the cost of parts or associated delays. It's only about $12 per car, but for Tesla I imagine every dollar counts. [0]: https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Tesla/salaries?location=US%2FCA%2FFremont https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Tesla/salaries?location=US%2FCA%2...
  - xkjkls 8y ago
    That's assuming the cost of labor is the only operating factor here. There are assumedly parts, factory operation, other opportunity costs at play here. Also, since Tesla has all of these cars under warranty themselves, if they do have issues after delivery, which quality control problems like this usually indicate it can really blow through their margins quickly.
- user5994461 8y ago
  It's a bit more than the output from a single person in a year. You just have to hire 2 more guys and you're good.
  - refurb 8y ago
    It takes 9 months to make a baby. You can't get 9 women and produce a baby in a month. 2 new guys don't have a year to rework 4300 cars.
MBCook 8y ago
No, but if 85% of cars need it that adds up fast.
- nsxwolf 8y ago
  Is this expected to be how things are going to go for the foreseeable future? If the situation is improved quickly, I don't see how this matters at all.
  - MBCook 8y ago
    They made a big deal about their push and how they made the number of cars they said they would (finally). Now we find out that there was an asterisk to that. The cars weren’t ready for sale without lots of manual rework. It makes their statement/accomplishment look much worse than they tried to play it. “85% of cars need manual fixes” is not a good look for any automaker. But it’s especially bad for one that there are lots of questions about who tried to use that goal as proof they were last their issues.
gamblor956 8y ago
As noted in other comments, other major carmakers can complete a car in about 1-3 minutes, not including customization tasks like painting. So 37 minutes of rework per vehicle means that they're less than 5% as efficient as their competitors, despite the massive investments they've made their factory line. It's indicative of serious production issues and will be a major roadblock to scaling future production, since it means that if they don't solve the production issues leading to the rework, then they would need to spend 20x what their competitors to achieve the same volume of production. EDIT: The 3 minutes is time-between cars. Each car takes 17-18 hours to get through the entire line. So 37 additional minutes is still pretty bad, but it's not 20x as inefficient on a time-basis. However, given the number of workers at the Tesla factory, they are still 20x as inefficient on a labor basis.
- freeone3000 8y ago
  That's pipelined time, not per-car time. Just because a car is produced every 3 minutes does not mean it takes 3 minutes to produce - that would be incredible.
- jessewmc 8y ago
  Are you sure? Not a production expert, but it sounds to me like this is a confusion of 'complete a car every 1-3 minutes' and 'complete a car in 1-3 minutes' They are two very different things, and I'm quite sure that no one is completing entire cars in 1-3 minutes.
- rurban 8y ago
  It's not bad at all, because it is only needed once until the bug is fixed. It's only a wrong manual task, so fixing this task sounds even trivial.
  - gamblor956 8y ago
    The problem is that it's not one particular problem with the assembly of the car--it's many problems that all need manual fixing. ("Manual task" in Teslaspeak refers to any task performed by a human on the line, not to any particular task.)
Const-me 8y ago
Exactly. Tesla says they pay $25/hour at Gigafactory, glassdoor says they’re paying $17-$22 hours to manufacturing workers. I’m not into manufacturing, but extra $10-15, for a car with starting price $35k, looks normal.
rurban 8y ago
It's also fixing a manual part, not an already automated part. Remember, Tesla has a much higher automation factor than everyone else, esp. to get the quality up and costs down in the end. Fixing just this failing manual part is not the drama the competitors are declaring. Tesla also needed this artificial 5.000 number to reach their mandatory milestone.

dgritsko 8y ago

37 minutes * 4300 cars = 2,651 hours of work.

strig 8y ago
So basically one full time employee for a year.
- anticensor 8y ago
  It depends on what parts need rework. It may not be doable by one employee.
- chipotle_coyote 8y ago
  If it's $80K a week, isn't that more like ~50 full-time employees for a year?
  - strig 8y ago
    Oh I didn't realize it was per week. You're right.
jakelarkin 8y ago
2,651 hours/week * $30/hour = ~$80k/week. on a volume of cars that brings in $200m/week. so what? its a minor inefficiency.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- LoSboccacc 8y ago
  not really. each rework is the equivalent of a branching prediction failure in a very very long cpu pipeline. all tasks are massively parallelized in a production line. to reach 5000 car month tesla need to crank a car every seven minutes. now imagine a production line that pump a car out every seven minutes and you need 37 minutes manual labor for each of them the inefficence doesn't look so minor. it's also a logisticsl nightmare, just imagine parking all those cars while the rework stations free up.
  - zaroth 8y ago
    In the time it takes one person to do the 37 minutes of rework you have taken 5 more cars off the line. So 6 mechanics in 6 bays at the end of the line do the rework jobs and cars continue to flow out of the plant one every 7 minutes. An extra $20 in COGS per car. Is this really so horrible? What am I missing? Even if it’s 10 mechanics and 10 drivers moving cars into and out of the bays, with some bays idle some of the time and let’s call it an extra $60 in COGS. Their gross margin is already way better than anyone expected to see on the Model 3, they used some very impressive electrical design to save in so many places. Even just their rear view mirror is more than $50 cheaper than the competition’s mirrors because of their smart electrical design. [1] Right now they need volume more than anything else. Speaking as a reservation holder. [1] - https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-3-solidly-profitable-sandy-munro/ https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-3-solidly-profitable-s...
    - LoSboccacc 8y ago
      > What am I missing? just on top on my mind tooling, factory space, training, burnout, turns, above average defects that will have to be handled by the post sales network. > they used some very impressive electrical design oh yes they are brilliant car, no question about that. it's less impressive when you get an engineering marvel and the build quality is random depending on the hands that worked on it in post processing.
  - dmurray 8y ago
    > the inefficence doesn't look so minor. it's also a logisticsl nightmare, just imagine parking all those cars while the rework stations free up. To park a car every seven minutes? Maybe one extra full time employee?
- falcolas 8y ago
  Per employee doing rework. To complete tasks which involve taking pieces off and putting them back on in ~30 minutes, you're probably looking at up to 10 people (for example, changing a bushing on a Mercedes that requires the complete disassembly of the rear of the car is around 6 hours of labor). As a point of comparison, large car manufacturers get into the "how much would a lawsuit and recall cost" when discussing adding costs of $4-$5 per car.
kingbirdy 8y ago
Per [0] it seems like line workers make ~$20/hr, so that's over $50,000 per week to fix the cars, not including the cost of parts or associated delays. It's only about $12 per car, but for Tesla I imagine every dollar counts. [0]: https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Tesla/salaries?location=US%2FCA%2FFremont https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Tesla/salaries?location=US%2FCA%2...
- xkjkls 8y ago
  That's assuming the cost of labor is the only operating factor here. There are assumedly parts, factory operation, other opportunity costs at play here. Also, since Tesla has all of these cars under warranty themselves, if they do have issues after delivery, which quality control problems like this usually indicate it can really blow through their margins quickly.
user5994461 8y ago
It's a bit more than the output from a single person in a year. You just have to hire 2 more guys and you're good.
- refurb 8y ago
  It takes 9 months to make a baby. You can't get 9 women and produce a baby in a month. 2 new guys don't have a year to rework 4300 cars.

MBCook 8y ago

No, but if 85% of cars need it that adds up fast.

nsxwolf 8y ago
Is this expected to be how things are going to go for the foreseeable future? If the situation is improved quickly, I don't see how this matters at all.
- MBCook 8y ago
  They made a big deal about their push and how they made the number of cars they said they would (finally). Now we find out that there was an asterisk to that. The cars weren’t ready for sale without lots of manual rework. It makes their statement/accomplishment look much worse than they tried to play it. “85% of cars need manual fixes” is not a good look for any automaker. But it’s especially bad for one that there are lots of questions about who tried to use that goal as proof they were last their issues.

gamblor956 8y ago

As noted in other comments, other major carmakers can complete a car in about 1-3 minutes, not including customization tasks like painting. So 37 minutes of rework per vehicle means that they're less than 5% as efficient as their competitors, despite the massive investments they've made their factory line. It's indicative of serious production issues and will be a major roadblock to scaling future production, since it means that if they don't solve the production issues leading to the rework, then they would need to spend 20x what their competitors to achieve the same volume of production. EDIT: The 3 minutes is time-between cars. Each car takes 17-18 hours to get through the entire line. So 37 additional minutes is still pretty bad, but it's not 20x as inefficient on a time-basis. However, given the number of workers at the Tesla factory, they are still 20x as inefficient on a labor basis.

freeone3000 8y ago
That's pipelined time, not per-car time. Just because a car is produced every 3 minutes does not mean it takes 3 minutes to produce - that would be incredible.
jessewmc 8y ago
Are you sure? Not a production expert, but it sounds to me like this is a confusion of 'complete a car every 1-3 minutes' and 'complete a car in 1-3 minutes' They are two very different things, and I'm quite sure that no one is completing entire cars in 1-3 minutes.
rurban 8y ago
It's not bad at all, because it is only needed once until the bug is fixed. It's only a wrong manual task, so fixing this task sounds even trivial.
- gamblor956 8y ago
  The problem is that it's not one particular problem with the assembly of the car--it's many problems that all need manual fixing. ("Manual task" in Teslaspeak refers to any task performed by a human on the line, not to any particular task.)

Const-me 8y ago

Exactly. Tesla says they pay $25/hour at Gigafactory, glassdoor says they’re paying $17-$22 hours to manufacturing workers. I’m not into manufacturing, but extra $10-15, for a car with starting price $35k, looks normal.

rurban 8y ago

It's also fixing a manual part, not an already automated part. Remember, Tesla has a much higher automation factor than everyone else, esp. to get the quality up and costs down in the end. Fixing just this failing manual part is not the drama the competitors are declaring. Tesla also needed this artificial 5.000 number to reach their mandatory milestone.